Trending
Opinion: How will Project 2025 impact game developers?
The Heritage Foundation's manifesto for the possible next administration could do great harm to many, including large portions of the game development community.
In his regular Gamasutra column, author and game designer Ian Bogost analyzes EA DICE's Mirror's Edge, suggesting just why the title "presents a new view of
December 23, 2008
Author: by Staff
In his regular Gamasutra column, author and game designer Ian Bogost analyzes EA DICE's Mirror's Edge, suggesting just why the title "presents a new view of our own experience of the world." Bogost provides several examples to describe how this first person action-adventure game serves as an interactive mirror, providing players with a new perspective on themselves and their place in the world. He notes that the primary inspiration for Mirror's Edge, parkour (free running), forces players to look at and move around the game world in a new way: Like the skateboarder, the free runner sees the world differently: as a set of affordances for previously unintended means of locomotion. But there is something else about parkour that Mirror's Edge translates deftly: a sense of fluidity. The free runner does not simply see the city differently, he sees it as such without hesitation, moving immediately from step to wall to landing to ledge to ground. This sense of effortless continuity is what makes parkour beautiful to watch and, I presume, gratifying to experience. Not only must the successful free runner make alternate use of familiar surfaces, but also he must do so as smoothly as possible. Mirror's Edge deploys two main strategies to create the experience of fluidity. The first is its first-person perspective, an unusual, risky decision that alienates some players, those unable to get over the fact that Unreal Engine 3 would have afforded a more straightforward third-person viewpoint. The game would indeed probably have been easier to play with the camera locked behind its main character, Faith. But the game's purpose was not to make movement predictable and easy -- to make it transparent, in the lingo of HCI. Rather, Mirror's Edge attempts to create a sense of vertigo which the player must constantly overcome in order to reorient Faith toward her next objective. The rewards for success are remarkable: running to a sprint and properly vaulting a fence produces a sense of physical mastery commensurate with the parkour expert. The second main strategy that Mirror's Edge employs to create the experience of fluidity is its unusual level structure, one designed for difficulty: "Mirror's Edge is a hard game; the number of times a player, even a good one, will fail is utterly enormous. When such failures occur, the game often asks the player to restart from a particularly punitive location, demanding that he work back to a point where, inevitably, he is likely once again to tumble violently down to earth. Unlike Assassin's Creed, which adapts the fluidity of parkour by making movement consistently easy, Mirror's Edge adapts that fluidity by making it hard. But what initially seems like a punitive design gaffe actually carries a crucial payload: requiring the player to reattempt sets of runs insures that the final, successful one will be completed all in one go. This is not the same type of frustration that one finds in Mega Man: the punitive levels are not conduits for final accomplishment and trophy, but for mastery over the very process of moving through the levels themselves." You can read the full feature, which includes additional examples on how Mirror's Edge provides players with a new perspective on themselves and their place in the world (no registration required, please feel free to link to this feature from other websites).
Read more about:
2008You May Also Like