Trending
Opinion: How will Project 2025 impact game developers?
The Heritage Foundation's manifesto for the possible next administration could do great harm to many, including large portions of the game development community.
Featured Blog | This community-written post highlights the best of what the game industry has to offer. Read more like it on the Game Developer Blogs or learn how to Submit Your Own Blog Post
A neat way to access privates from one class to another, without direct inheritance or friend.
[ From Pompi Dev Blog ]
Here is a neat little way I found to make one class access the privates of another class, without using friend or direct inheritance. Take a look at this code:
class A {
public:
class Observer {
protected:
int GetPrivate(A & a) {return a.ValueA;};
};
private:
int ValueA;
};
class B: public A::Observer {
public:
void Foo (A & a) {
Do something with GetPrivate(a);
}
};
Class B cannot access the privates of class A directly, but it inherits a subclass of A that can access the privates of A given as a parameter. Since I have just tried this "pattern" recently, I am not sure what is the direct benefit of this.
I believe a benefit can be in the sense of making a programmer's life easier. Programming languages play several parts. They provide us powerful functionality, but they also suppose to give us ease of use. You can program anything on assembly, but it would be really difficult to write a big game in assembly. If you do not expose privates via a getter, you give the programmer one less method to think about when he need to use the class's instance for something.
Can you think how you would use this "pattern"? Do you think there is no use for it? Tell me what you think.
You May Also Like